|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#72701: closed (eglot crash when project-files-relative-names t) |
Date: | Sun, 08 Sep 2024 20:52:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Sun, 8 Sep 2024 23:51:43 +0300 with message-id <bf85f421-1e19-4562-8295-67308e852089@gutov.dev> and subject line Re: bug#72701: eglot crash when project-files-relative-names t has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #72701, regarding eglot crash when project-files-relative-names t to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 72701: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=72701 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: eglot crash when project-files-relative-names t Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 11:43:01 -0400 project-files-relative-names was introduced a few months ago, so it's no surprise that there are some side effects when set.This affects the handler for workspace/didChangeWatchedFiles. The result is that dirs-to-watch...(dirs-to-watch
(delete-dups (mapcar #'file-name-directory
(project-files
(eglot--project server))))))...is nil when project-files-relative-names is t, due to file-name-directory failing to parse the directories it was expecting. This results in file-readable-p failing with a nil dir:(watch-dir (dir)
(when-let ((probe
(and (file-readable-p dir)One solution which I've tested is simply the defensive:(project-files-relative-names nil) ; add this(dirs-to-watch
(delete-dups (mapcar #'file-name-directory
(project-files
(eglot--project server))))))-Stephane
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#72701: eglot crash when project-files-relative-names t Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 23:51:43 +0300 User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird On 08/09/2024 13:56, João Távora wrote:On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 3:24 AM Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> wrote:On 07/09/2024 10:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote:Ping! Is this issue resolved and can be closed, or do we need to do anything else here?I suggest installing the following. Not a hard necessity, but seems like an improvement:Let's not, for all the reasons enunciated up-thread.Very well - I've just installed the docstring update. Thanks, closing.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |