Re: Emba project visibility

[Joel Reicher]

"J.P." <jp@neverwas.me> writes:

> Narrowing makes sense. In addition to those /raw blob files, it 
> would also be helpful to exempt individual resources in the 
> navigable artifacts endpoints under each job, for example:
>
>   
> https://emba.gnu.org/emacs/emacs/-/jobs/104337/artifacts/file/test-all-inotify-f0bec20a/junit-test-report.xml

That's working also with the change I did.

> > Regarding a more sophisticated protection mechanism such as 
> > Anubis, it and others are getting a lot of discussion amongst 
> > the FSF tech staff as all of the FSF assets are getting 
> > assaulted by the same things that were bringing down EMBA. I am 
> > monitoring that discussion for things that I can use with EMBA, 
> > but the current view is that Anubis doesn't comply with FSF's 
> > freedom standards because it uses JS.
>
> I'd interested in following along if any of those discussions 
> are public or become so in the future. Thanks a lot for doing 
> this.

A lot of it is happening on #fsfsys. I think some is also on 
mailing lists but I'm not getting time to read most email at the 
moment.

Regards,

       - Joel