[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vc-do-command: doc/code inconsistency

From: Kai Großjohann
Subject: Re: vc-do-command: doc/code inconsistency
Date: 11 Nov 2000 11:39:54 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90

On 11 Nov 2000, Andre Spiegel wrote:
> address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>> The doc says that output goes to BUFFER, but the code seems to make
>> output go to (current-buffer).  If I understand it correctly.
> I don't know what makes you believe so.  To me the code seems rather
> clear (incidentally, the buffer-setup thing was written by Stefan
> :-).

Oh, my.  I completely missed the vc-setup-buffer call.  Argh.  I'm

>> While I'm at it: why is the file-relative-name used in that
>> function, rather than putting the expanded file name in squeezed?
> Probably because one of the backends refused to work otherwise (CVS
> is a likely candidate).

Ah.  Thanks, Eli, for clearing this up even further.  I think I
understand now.

The rest of the discussion will go to personal mail, as suggested by
Andre.  Sorry for the line noise.

The arms should be held in a natural and unaffected way and never
be conspicuous. -- Revised Technique of Latin American Dancing

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]