[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme

From: Gerd Moellmann
Subject: Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme
Date: 14 May 2001 11:39:36 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104

address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Idly wondering what's the maintainers' opinion about CL versus
> Scheme...  Should Emacs move towards one of the two languages as
> extension language, and if so, which one?

My personal opinion is that it would be a mistake to try to replace
ELisp with a different language; there's just too much ELisp out
there which breaks even with small changes of semantics.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]