[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device) |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:31:06 -0600 (MDT) |
That's why your statement that `mule has to go away first' seems
nonsensical to me. Of course, _part_ of mule must go -- the part that's
being replaced, and any other parts that are too closely dependent on
that representation -- but to say _all_ of mule must go is ignorant of
what mule is. [of course, it's possible that the majority of people use
the word `mule' in a much more narrow sense, to refer specifically to
the current internal encoding, in which case I'll happily admit to being
wrong!]
However few or many they are, you are right and they are wrong.
- Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Karl Eichwalder, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Miles Bader, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Stefan Monnier, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Richard Stallman, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Dave Love, 2001/07/22