[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexical mumblings
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: lexical mumblings |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:16:28 -0700 (MST) |
- having `llet' and `dlet' as "main" forms and `let' as an alias to one
of them (`dlet' by default); then (use-lexical-binding) would just do
(defalias 'let 'llet)
- adding CL `special' declarations, and making `let' a macro,
like I have in CLOCC/CLLIB/elisp.lisp:
Neither of these will work correctly--they have the wrong scoping ;-).
The correct behavior is that code which was read in as lexical is
always lexical, and code that was read in as dynamic is always
dynamic.
- Re: lexical mumblings, (continued)
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Sam Steingold, 2001/10/26
- Re: lexical mumblings,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
Re: lexical mumblings, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/21
Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/20