[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?
Date: 08 Dec 2001 00:47:07 +0900

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
> And this is from someone who's a strong proponent of lexical scoping
> because he finds closures invaluable.

[Though, as I noted before, closures can be had without lexical
binding -- in a deep-binding implementation, for instance (aka
spaghetti stacks).]

[|nurgle|]  ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that 
            will  make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth? 
[iddt]      nurg, that's the goal 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]