Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el

[Dave Love]

>>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes:

 > Is there any particular reason why the latin-ltx.el was changed
 > today to produce the Hebrew letters Aleph, Bet, Gimel, and Dalet,
 > instead of the symbols by the same names (which have different
 > Unicode codepoints)?

They were confusing, just as if \mu produced U+00b5.

 > latin-ltx is not a Hebrew input method, so producing
 > only 4 letters doesn't seem useful.

If more are useful, they could be added.