[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2001 21:45:45 -0500 |
> We don't want to try to design Emacs to be able to communicate with
> general C packages. They have to be written for Emacs, and we want it
> to be that way, because that makes the GPL situation as clear cut as
> possible.
I don't understand what you mean by that. Emacs already links
with many libraries that have not been written for Emacs (libX for
starters, and the W32 DLLs after that).
Stefan
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, (continued)
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2001/12/07
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, William M. Perry, 2001/12/12
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Scott Lanning, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2001/12/13
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Scott Lanning, 2001/12/14
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, William M. Perry, 2001/12/14
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Miles Bader, 2001/12/14
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/15
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, William M. Perry, 2001/12/16
- Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/17
Re: GNU TLS lisp bindings, Steve Kemp, 2001/12/14