[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lost argument and doc string
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: lost argument and doc string |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:01:30 -0800 (PST) |
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:43:56 +0200 (IST): Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Tak Ota wrote:
>
> > I did the same experiment, running make-docfile manually on simple.el,
> > and got surprised. And the source file is requesting the sequence
> > `dquote bslash newline' as the beginning of the valid doc string in
> > case of el files. I don't think this is right. Starting doc string
> > that way is only optional I believe.
>
> Please make sure that any changes you make in this don't break
> loaddefs.el. I believe loaddefs is the reason for that requirement of
> how the doc string should begin (since loaddefs is generated by a
> program, there's no problem satisfying that requirement in that case). I
> imagine that there was some reason to require such a format, in which
> case we should avoid breaking that.
Sure, the change I submitted for make-docfile.c does not change any
doc strings, thus I believe does not affect loaddefs.el either. It
only changes how to find the doc strings, including from loaddefs.el.
And yes, it must be made clear why those constraints I removed from
make-docfile.c were there before.
-Tak
- Re: lost argument and doc string, (continued)
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Pavel JanÃk, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/11
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string,
Tak Ota <=
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/14
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/15
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/15
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/13