[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unify on encoding
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Unify on encoding |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:12:00 -0500 |
> > I only objected to the latter part, because doing so would change an
> > important characteristic of the default operation without leaving an
> > escape route for users who don't want the new default.
>
> The escape route would be to select an iso2022 or emacs-mule coding
> system from the expanded list offered. Or do those get unified as well?
I believe you're confusing the current issue (unify-on-encoding)
which has no known negative side-effect with the problem discussed
a few weeks/months back that occurs due to unify-on-decoding.
Stefan
- Unify on encoding, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/17
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/18
- Re: Unify on encoding, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/18
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/18
- Re: Unify on encoding, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/19
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/19
- Re: Unify on encoding, Jason Rumney, 2002/03/19
- Re: Unify on encoding,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/20
- Re: Unify on encoding, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/20
Re: Unify on encoding, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/18