[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 06:08:58 -0600 (MDT) |
Currently, the definition of ``trailing whitespace'' includes only ASCII
whitespace characters. If we are to broaden this definition to non-ASCII
characters, I think we need a more general definition; just adding a
Latin-1 NBSP is not enough, IMHO.
What is the syntax code of Latin-1 NBSP? Is it "whitespace"?
If not, why not?
If it is, then why not make "trailing whitespace" include everything
with whitespace syntax?
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/09
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/10
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/11
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/12
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/13
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/14
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/15
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18