Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality.

[Kim F. Storm]

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:

> > I've described that several times by now -- I'm trying to find the
> > right approach to address the issues with complex modes which uses a
> > lot of keymaps (like cua and viper) and base the selection between
> > those keymaps on combining various state information, i.e. to provide
> > a more versatile keymap functionality than what is currently
> > available.
> 
> I haven't heard any comment about my proposal to use `menu-item'
> bindings with a :enable setting in order to get conditional bindings
> (this doesn't currently work, but it should be pretty easy to make
> it work).
> Would it help you solve your problems ?

Considering that cua has approx 100 bindings in 7 keymaps,
it seems like absolute overkill IMO to condition each of those
100 bindings individually instead of just the 7 keymaps which
contain those bindings...

I don't think that is a _better_ solution.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk