[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-dat
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) |
Date: |
22 Apr 2002 13:18:27 +0900 |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> The manual should be indexed well enough to allow you to find any
> important issue within seconds by using the `i' command. If you
> cannot find some issue via `i', I suggest to file a docs bug report.
Come to think of it, why not automatically add clickable references from
doc-strings into the info manual? That seems like it would be pretty
easy to do, since the necessary information is already there.
`Info-goto-emacs-command-node' already does something similar for
commands (though in a slightly less convenient way). I don't know
whether the method Info-goto-emacs-command-node uses would be best for
doing all functions; maybe it would be better to just run a build-time
script that extracts the references from the .texi files and actually
embeds it into the doc-strings.
-Miles
--
Suburbia: where they tear out the trees and then name streets after them.
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), (continued)
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Michael Matthew Toomim, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Michael Toomim, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Terje Bless, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Terje Bless, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Terje Bless, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date),
Miles Bader <=
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/22
- RE: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Andy Piper, 2002/04/22
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Terje Bless, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Sean MacLennan, 2002/04/23
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/24
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Jan D., 2002/04/24
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/21
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Terje Bless, 2002/04/21
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/21