Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality.

[Richard Stallman]

    > If you need to condition some of these maps on some symbol's being
    > false, then we could make the minimal extension so far proposed, which
    > is to allow minor-mode-map-alist (or another new alist) to have
    > conditions which are more complex than just a symbol.  But you do see
    > if you can easily get away without that.

    If we don't allow some form of simple logical expression [e.g. the
    functions I listed in a previous mail],

What are the three conditions that you want to test for?
Let's see what features they require.