[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reducing defface redundancy
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: reducing defface redundancy |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:37:11 -0600 (MDT) |
So a user can just write:
[ALTERNATIVE1 ALTERNATIVE2 ... DEFAULT]
and the lisp code will effectively say `does the display support all
the attributes ALTERNATIVE1? If so, lets use that. If not, does the
display support all the attributes in ALTERNATIVE2? ...' etc.
I see. This is certainly a convenient thing to do in Lisp terms.
And this, by itself, would not pose a problem for Custom.
What does pose a problem for Custom is the nesting of constructs
that you also propose to add.
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, (continued)
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/24
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/24
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/25
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/25
Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/21