[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: init_buffer PWD fix
From: |
宮下 尚:HIMI |
Subject: |
Re: init_buffer PWD fix |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:35:41 +0900 |
User-agent: |
T-gnus/6.15.4 (based on Oort Gnus v0.04) (revision 11) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.1 (i386-msvc-nt5.1.2600) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Meadow/1.99 Alpha1 (AWOFUCHI) |
MIYASHITA Hisashi(宮下 尚:HIMI) <address@hidden> writes:
>> Yes, it's important; and once w32.c is fixed it will not be ignored.
>
> This word forcibly reminds me that it was very hard for me to
> persuade Emacs developpers on the issues of Windows. I think we
> should even remove such hard-to-understand code in purely technical view.
> But I think users' convenience takes the highest priority, I can agree
> on the code.
How about splitting this part into a new function (like getcwd_preferable())
and moving it to sysdep.c? Could you agree this?
from himi
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, (continued)
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix,
宮下 尚:HIMI <=
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/25
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24