[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:39:33 +0300 (IDT) |
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Richard Stallman wrote:
> So far you have not made an argument against this change.
I wasn't arguing against the change. I was brainstorming its possible
consequences. Bitter experience had taught me that Mule-related changes
frequently have unexpected side effects, so I thought it would be useful
to look at this from several aspects before the decision is made.
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stephen Gildea, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/26
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/27
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/28
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/30
- Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/28
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/30
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/29
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/29
Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/30