[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More Latin-9 input methods?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: More Latin-9 input methods? |
Date: |
Sun, 5 May 2002 16:48:04 +0300 (IDT) |
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?= wrote:
> There are characters in Latin-1 that are missing from Latin-9, and
> vice versa. If there is only one input method, what should it do
> with these characters?
Insert them nonetheless (in the only possible charset)?
- More Latin-9 input methods?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/03
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/04
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/04
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/05
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/06
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/06
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/06
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/07
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/07