[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More Latin-9 input methods?
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: More Latin-9 input methods? |
Date: |
Tue, 07 May 2002 16:06:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Latin-1 and Latin-2 are very different. Each has a number
> of single-language input methods, but they are for different languages.
> By contrast, Latin-1 and Latin-9 are meant for the same languages,
> are they not?
I confess that I'm not sure. Latin-9 adds some letters which look as
if they might be intended for an Eastern European language, but I'm
not sure.
> Meanwhile, most of the input methods (the ones for specific languages,
> suchas german-prefix) use only characters that are the same in Latin-1
> and Latin-9. So it would be trivial to set these up to work in both
> character sets depending on a flag.
I guess that each Latin-9 method would be equal to the Latin-1 method
plus a way to type the Euro sign. So they are indeed very similar.
Let me try to cons up something.
> Meanwhile, we should have separate input methods latin-1-postfix and
> latin-9-postfix.
These are already there, which is good.
kai
--
Silence is foo!
- More Latin-9 input methods?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/03
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/04
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/04
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/05
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/05
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/06
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/06
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/06
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: More Latin-9 input methods?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/07