[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defvar vs setqif..
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: defvar vs setqif.. |
Date: |
21 May 2002 08:15:50 +0900 |
"D. Goel" <address@hidden> writes:
> > > So i was wondering is a special-form like 'setqif' could be
> >
> > That name would be wrong, because the usage of defvar you're
> > complaining about doesn't set the variable at all.
>
> but that's why i had an 'if' at the end.. to suggest that setq only if
> not already defined.. else don't setq..
I guess this is already resolved, but just to make sure things are
clear, `defvar' without an initializer _never_ binds or sets the variable.
In fact it shouldn't affect the variable at all, only meta-information
about the variable.
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Re: defvar vs setqif.., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/20
Re: defvar vs setqif.., Miles Bader, 2002/05/19