[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: & requires l-value

From: Ken Raeburn
Subject: Re: & requires l-value
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 17:36:13 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.1.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> Surely as a temporary workaround, XCDR_AS_LVALUE would be better than
> backing out the LISP_MAKE_RVALUE changes, or am I missing something
> else?

Yes, I suppose it would.  I guess I'm just reacting reflexively to
someone proposing use of something I intented to be "internal" to the
Lisp implementation.  Of course, hacking LISP_MAKE_RVALUE to disable
it has the same effect, but I had hacked it first :-).

> It might be a few days before I get time to fix this properly, so if
> XCDR_AS_LVALUE is an acceptable temporary solution, could someone
> please make that change so Windows users can build again (I won't be
> able to make the change until at least tomorrow evening).

Done.  Juanma, could you please test it?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]