[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed? |
Date: |
25 May 2002 18:53:38 -0400 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
Incidentally, it's a big pain to read uuencoded stuff. Why not just
post the diffs themselves?
ok. i guess uu approach is from old days (when mail readers were prone to
mangle diffs). that's not an issue if the diff is to be read only (and not
applied).
thi
- display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/23
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/27
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/28
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/27
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/27