Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

[Alan Shutko]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> If you mean that DOC doesn't include all the doc strings it should,
> then it's a bug that should be fixed.

No, it's related to this section from etc/PROBLEMS:

    * Self documentation messages are garbled.

    This means that the file `etc/DOC-...' doesn't properly correspond
    with the Emacs executable.  Redumping Emacs and then installing the
    corresponding pair of files should fix the problem.

I'm afraid I don't know how this section works, just that if you
recompile Emacs without X but use the DOC from the X version, the
messages are garbled.  The RH patches I looked at way back when
referenced a DOC and a DOC-X11, depending on how it was compiled
(iirc).

-- 
Alan Shutko <address@hidden> - In a variety of flavors!
My, how you've changed since I've changed.