[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

From: Alan Shutko
Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 12:42:20 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> If you mean that DOC doesn't include all the doc strings it should,
> then it's a bug that should be fixed.

No, it's related to this section from etc/PROBLEMS:

    * Self documentation messages are garbled.

    This means that the file `etc/DOC-...' doesn't properly correspond
    with the Emacs executable.  Redumping Emacs and then installing the
    corresponding pair of files should fix the problem.

I'm afraid I don't know how this section works, just that if you
recompile Emacs without X but use the DOC from the X version, the
messages are garbled.  The RH patches I looked at way back when
referenced a DOC and a DOC-X11, depending on how it was compiled

Alan Shutko <address@hidden> - In a variety of flavors!
My, how you've changed since I've changed.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]