[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
04 Jul 2002 10:35:51 +0900 |
Jon Cast <address@hidden> writes:
> I apologize for saying 18 was the first non-1.x release (whoops), but
> I stand firm in my position major number changes have always meant
> significant changes internally (although clearly not the other way
> around).
Anyway I don't think it really matters if this convention wasn't
followed strictly a long time ago; it's been followed pretty
consistently for over a decade at least, I'd say, and people definitely
get excited when they hear that an emacs release with a bumped major
version is coming...
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Ken Raeburn, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Robert J. Chassell, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02