[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 08:21:11 +0200 |
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 07:08:09 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> How about if you invoke command.com explicitly, like this:
>
> command.com /c for .... >>foo.txt
I'll have to test it tonight at home, but I don't see how could it work,
because, as my example .BAT file showed, the bug with "for", "if" and
redirection happens also in the command line (or at least inside a .BAT
file) and is not related to nmake.
> Windows shells are themselves ugly hacks, so any means of getting them
> to do what we want is IMHO justified ;-)
Also sprach Machiavelli ;-)
Anyway, does anyone know why term/ shouldn't be included in subdirs.el?
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/04
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/06
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/18
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/22
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24