[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:41:15 +0200 |
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:28:33 -0400, "Stefan Monnier"
<monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
> I think there's a misunderstanding here. A `subroutine' is not just
> any random function, but it's a function that's implemented in C
> (hence `subrp' and `subr-arity').
Well, you're right. I think we just weren't using the language in such a
precise way :)
I interpreted Richard's comment as saying that not every tiny piece of
code has to be a routine (be that a C soubrutine or an elisp function).
/L/e/k/t/u
- find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/21
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/21
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/22
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/22
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/23
- Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/23