[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: while-no-input
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: while-no-input |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 03:20:59 -0400 |
> "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > However, it would cleaner if instead of generating a quit signal it
> > > did a throw to a specified tag.
> >
> > The reason I didn't do that is that it didn't seem necessary
> > and that I didn't want the QUIT macro to grow, but I could introduce
> > a new function `quit' that the QUIT macro could call and which would
> > either call `Fsignal (Qquit, Qnil)' ot `Fthrow (...)'.
>
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > That would be ok.
>
> Stefan,
>
> What happened with this feature?
Backburner. Because I have other things to do for now and also because,
to tell you the truth, I'm not really psyched at the idea of using `throw'
instead of (signal 'quit <value>): after all this quit-on-input is really
a variant of `quit' and not something of a different nature.
Proof is that it should (and does) obey inhibit-quit.
Stefan
- Re: while-no-input, (continued)
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/02
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/02
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/04
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/04
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/05
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/23
- Re: while-no-input,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/24
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/29
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/31
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/31
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/05