[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Nov 2002 15:32:47 -0500 |
> > >> Yes. IIRC, this is hard-coded in the encoder's C code: it works as
> if
> > >> latin-1 was actually iso-latin-1-wth-esc.
> > > How can we change that ?
> > This change will do.
> This user-visible change would affect much more than ispell.
Huh? Such as what? I's very unusual to apply a coding-system to a piece of
text that is not within the safe-chars of that coding-system.
I'd say it's *not* user-visible.
> Is it the right thing in general?
I think so. If you want to allow and deal with non-latin-N chars,
you should use the iso-latin-N-with-esc version of the coding-system.
Stefan
- iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/07
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/10
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/12
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/17
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/18