[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Matching lint error messages
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Matching lint error messages |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 07:36:51 -0500 |
compile.el includes this regexp
;; 4.3BSD lint pass 3
;; bloofle defined( /users/wolfgang/foo.c(4) ), but never used
;; This used to be
;; ("[ \t(]+\\([a-zA-Z]?:?[^:( \t\n]+\\)[:( \t]+\\([0-9]+\\)[:) \t]+" 1 2)
;; which is regexp Impressionism - it matches almost anything!
(".*([ \t]*\\([a-zA-Z]?:?[^:( \t\n]+\\)[:(][ \t]*\\([0-9]+\\))" 1 2)
which still tends to match too easily. I wonder if this output format
is still used. Could someone look at Solaris and *BSD and see (1)
whether they still have a `lint' program, and (2) what format it uses
for such error messages now?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Matching lint error messages,
Richard Stallman <=