[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: problem with uniquify.el and kill-buffer-hook

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: problem with uniquify.el and kill-buffer-hook
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:36:51 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 01:31:51PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
>       (put 'kill-buffer-hook 'permanent-local t)
>     But doing this by default may cause problems for other code
> I grepped for kill-buffer-hook and looked at some of the uses.
> It looks like many others would be helped by this change
> and none would be hurt by it.

Hmmm, it didn't occur to me that that might be the case!

If kill-buffer-hook is made permanent-local, should the documentation mention
that this is the case?  I looked at some other permanent-local variables, and
none seem to say so in their doc-string.

[Incidentally, some of them seem rather suspicious; for instance, why is
`enriched-mode' (the mode variable for enriched-mode) permanent-local?!
Is enriched-mode not a normal major mode?]

> Would someone like to check all of them?  The total number is only 60
> or so.

If no one else gets around to it, I'll do this when I get some time.

o The existentialist, not having a pillow, goes everywhere with the book by
  Sullivan, _I am going to spit on your graves_.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]