[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:42:12 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Sure, but the cases I'm particularly thinking of are actually
> programs, not interactive use. I think it's better to get escape
> codes, which can be reconstructed, than to get `?', which can't.
Yes, it's better for Emacs, but not for the other programs
(e.g. ispell). And such Emacs Lisp applications that use
wrong coding system should be fixed anyway.
> I realize this won't work generally, and will be different
> for Emacs 22. In Emacs 22, it would be reasonable to do
> what yudit does (as far as I remember) and write
> representations of the unicodes involved as \uxxxx or
> similar.
I was also thinking about that for emacs-unicode. Perhaps
using the same format as yudit is good. And, we'll provide
a command `recover-unencoded-characters'.
>> So, my conclusion was that writing out those escape
>> sequences not only violates the commonly accepted concept
>> about a coding system,
> What concept do you mean, exactly?
For instance, the MIME charset iso-8859-1 can encode Latin-1
chars only, and it's stateless, no escape sequences.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, (continued)
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Dave Love, 2002/12/10
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/11
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/12/12
- Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/14
- None, Kenichi Handa, 2002/12/17
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/12/09
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Dave Love, 2002/12/15
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars,
Kenichi Handa <=
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Dave Love, 2002/12/19
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/12/23
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Dave Love, 2002/12/23
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Kenichi Handa, 2002/12/25
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Ken Stevens, 2002/12/31
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Stefan Monnier, 2002/12/16
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Dave Love, 2002/12/19
Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/16