[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28 |
Date: |
18 Jan 2003 13:35:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> ! The string argument is normally a multibyte string, except:
> ! - if the process' input coding system is no-conversion or raw-text,
> ! it is a unibyte string (the non-converted input), or else
>
> Is this really the right way for it to work?
> Should the choice of unibyte or multibyte string
> be tied in this way to the choice of coding system?
Maybe provide `set-process-multibyte' analogue to `set-buffer-multibyte'.
>
> If you want multibyte strings "without decoding", would emacs-mule
> give you that?
That's what string-as-multibyte is for I think.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/17
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/18
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/19
- unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/19
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/20
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/22