[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al. |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:12:46 -0500 |
> It's easy enough to change Info-fontify-node to be more paranoid, but to
> me, the current behavior of `next-property-change' seems wrong in this
> case -- I think if there's no property change before (point-max), and
> the user passed LIMIT == nil, then it should return nil, regardless of
> whether (point-max) is due to narrowing or not.
100% agreement (obviously, for those who've looked at the changelog ;-)
Stefan
- question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Miles Bader, 2003/01/23
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/24
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Miles Bader, 2003/01/24
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/25
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/25
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/26
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/27
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Miles Bader, 2003/01/27
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/28