[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28 |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:05:01 -0500 |
> I don't see a need to add string-to-unibyte.
We have string-as/make-multibyte and string-as/make-unibyte.
If one finds string-to-multibyte, it's quite natural that he
also expects string-to-unibyte. Even if it is an alias of
string-as-unibyte, I think it's worth having it. And, it's
simpler to have it than saying that we don't have
string-to-unibyte because ... in some place.
I don't think we should add functions merely for completeness.
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], (continued)
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Miles Bader, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/21
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Richard Stallman, 2003/01/22
- Re: unibyte<->multibyte conversion [Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/22
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/19
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/21