[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gratuitous changes

From: Edward O'Connor
Subject: Re: gratuitous changes
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:59:57 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

My $0.02 regarding removing extraneous whitespace, ?\ , etc:

It seems like the occurances of ?\ and ?\        (?\SPC and ?\TAB)
in source files is probably pretty minimal. In the particular
case of ?\      , we have a perfectly good and arguably more
readable substitute in ?\t, so why don't we adopt a good and
arguably more readable substitute for ?\ , say, ?\s?

Ted, who thinks (setq foo ?\ ) looks strange

Edward O'Connor

Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]