[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Customize Rogue
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Customize Rogue |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Mar 2003 16:45:32 +0100 |
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 16:15:07 +0100, Per Abrahamsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't think you should do so either, but some people want to do so
> for whatever reason, and the command is useful for them.
Yes, sure.
I reacted to the word "transition"**, but of course I'm not opposing
customize-rogue in any way.
**And the reason I reacted is that I hate finding those variables whose
docstrings say "Don't set this directly, use customize".
> What do you hope to accomplish by tricking customize?
Two things:
1.- Not getting the "modified outside of customize" messages that I get
the odd time I use it. If the value is right, I don't see the point of
knowing i.e. if I set custom-file to ".emacs.custom" via setq or through
M-x customize-variable; the message makes me wonder if anything's wrong...
2.- Using the customized initialization/setting/getting/whatever code
for those variables that have special needs. I'd like to do
(custom-setq variable value) ; or whatever
and get customize to check the value against the type spec, etc.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/06
- Re: Customize Rogue, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/03/06
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/06
- Re: Customize Rogue, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/03/07
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/07
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/09
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/09
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/10
- Re: Customize Rogue, Kim F. Storm, 2003/03/10
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/10