[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Customize Rogue

From: Luc Teirlinck
Subject: Re: Customize Rogue
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:12:58 -0600 (CST)

>From my previous message:

   That is why you need set-activate (or some alternative to it), even
   after custom-setq would be implemented, *if* you are going to keep
   customizations in multiple files, especially if are going to use an
   automated tool, like initsplit to help you do that.

I am not so sure anymore.  Custom writes into the "official"
custom-file to save the option.  Is it not the job of the automated
tool to now redirect this to the file it wants it redirected to and
make things function properly?  Is any other behavior not just a bug
in the automated tool?  In other words I now again believe that
custom-setq would make set-activate unnecessary.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]