[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence'
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence' |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:08:06 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, "Satyaki Das" <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> ;; Combining diacritics
>> (setq c #x300)
>> (while (<= c #x362)
>> (modify-category-entry (decode-char 'ucs c) ?^)
>> (setq c (1+ c)))
> If I were you I would be using loop as follows:
> ;; Combining diacritics
> (loop for c from #x300 to #x362
> do (modify-category-entry (decode-char 'ucs c) ?^))
> Is there any particular reason for loop to be avoided? It is a
> macro in CL, so it gets expanded at compile time. I ask since I
> have used it in MH-E.
The above is an example usage of `sequence' (or `range'),
not the reason of requesting this function. The original
reason is that there are cases that we need a list generated
by this function.
And, as far as I remember, it should be avoided to require
`cl' in a preloaded file if possible. Is this rule changed
now?
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', (continued)
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Kenichi Handa, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Kenichi Handa, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Stefan Monnier, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Kenichi Handa, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Kenichi Handa, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Satyaki Das, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence',
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Satyaki Das, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Kenichi Handa, 2003/03/24
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Satyaki Das, 2003/03/25
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Kenichi Handa, 2003/03/25
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Satyaki Das, 2003/03/25
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Kenichi Handa, 2003/03/25
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Satyaki Das, 2003/03/25
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/25
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Edward O'Connor, 2003/03/26
- Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence', Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/03/26