[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence'

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence'
Date: 26 Mar 2003 10:29:11 +0900

Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> > recall that the function signature is usually
> >   (iota COUNT &optional START INTERVAL)
> Ah, it's more general, but not convenient for the current
> situation where we want to specify START and END
> explicitely.  Otherwise, the code gets difficult to read.

I think this is a rather minor issue.  After all, the whole point of
this dicussion is whether it's a good idea to add a general function
rather than keeping the current specific one; if you want maximum
convenience, obviously the latter is the right way to go.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]