[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message |
|
Date: |
11 Apr 2003 11:38:14 +0900 |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> o If a rear-advancing overlay is in the minibufer and it
> has face (or any hooks) property, simply inserting a
> message yields an unpleasant result. It seems that we
> should have a new function insert-after-markers (analogous
> to insert-before-markers).
How about using an overlay with an `after-string' property, located at
the end of the minibuffer, for the minibuffer-message message itself?
Then there's no modification/insertion at all...
-Miles
--
`To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to,
all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson
- Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/09
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/10
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/10
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Miles Bader, 2003/04/11
- overlay property `after-string', Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: overlay property `after-string', Miles Bader, 2003/04/11
- Re: overlay property `after-string', Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/13
Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/10