[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Potential problem of minibuffer-message
Date: 11 Apr 2003 11:38:14 +0900

Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> o If a rear-advancing overlay is in the minibufer and it
>   has face (or any hooks) property, simply inserting a
>   message yields an unpleasant result.  It seems that we
>   should have a new function insert-after-markers (analogous
>   to insert-before-markers).

How about using an overlay with an `after-string' property, located at
the end of the minibuffer, for the minibuffer-message message itself?
Then there's no modification/insertion at all...

`To alcohol!  The cause of, and solution to,
 all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]