[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
|
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:08:22 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
> That's a bit beyond me. To really see it in a conclusive way, you
> need to download a message with a large attachment.
Yes. You could set imap-debug and/or imap-log. That will produce
buffers *imap-debug* and/or *imap-log*, and one of them shows the
Lisp calls made.
Maybe you can extract the Lisp calls from there?
--
file-error; Data: (Opening input file no such file or directory ~/.signature)
- Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22