[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2003 08:04:14 -0400 |
Anyway, would it be of any annoyance to add a
'zap-up-to-char' function which does the same as zap-to-char
except from removing the character?
I see no point in it, but I won't object if someone else adds it.
It could go in misc.el.
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, (continued)
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, jmarant, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Ehud Karni, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Jérôme Marant, 2003/05/21
- Re: Zap-to-char behaviour,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Zap-to-char behaviour, Jérôme Marant, 2003/05/22