[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: S-backspace
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: S-backspace |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2003 11:26:09 -0500 (CDT) |
Miles Bader wrote:
That's Ctl-Alt-backspace -- but hmmm, may be a bit too close for comfort...
You are the second person complaining about that. What about
<C-S-backspace>? Is Shift far enough from M- and Alt- on most
keyboards? C-S-k or, in a certain sense, C-K looks natural but might
set a bad precedent. Of course, none of these bindings will work
under emacs -nw or the like.
Remembers me of this "fun" binding:
Caution! Danger! Do not necessarily try!
`C-M-<DEL>'
Kill balanced expression backward (`backward-kill-sexp').
It is also bound to C-M-backspace. Even more dangerous. At least
C-M-<DEL> usually warns (might depend on the operating system).
C-M-backspace gives no warning. One can disable it, but that can pose
other problems. (On many keyboards one uses Alt for Meta.)
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: S-backspace, (continued)
- Re: S-backspace, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/26
- Re: S-backspace, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, David Kastrup, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Miles Bader, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: S-backspace, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Peter Lee, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Oliver Scholz, 2003/05/29
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/29
- Re: S-backspace, David Kastrup, 2003/05/31
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Kim F. Storm, 2003/05/30