[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MML charset tag regression

From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: MML charset tag regression
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 21:03:09 +0900 (JST)
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>  So, for instance, if iso-8859-2 characters arrive at
>> Emacs with UTF8_STRING, they are decoded into the charset
>> mule-unicode-0100-24ff and treated differently (e.g. in
>> searching) than the characters of the charset iso-8859-2.

> That's actually customizable if it's a real problem.

Currently, even if we customize utf-fragment-on-decoding to
t, iso-8859-2 chars encoded in utf-8 can't be decoded into
latin-iso8859-2 charset because utf-fragmentation-table
contain only Greek and Cyrillic chars.

Ken'ichi HANDA

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]