[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: INSTALL-CVS
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: INSTALL-CVS |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jun 2003 14:49:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Masterson <address@hidden> writes:
|> Hmmm. But, since most (all?) 'make' commands only do time-stamp
|> checking to determine if a target should be rebuilt, if the rerun of
|> configure causes the Makefile(s) to be regen'ed with new or changed
|> commands in a target, that target may not be rebuilt because you
|> didn't "clean" your environment first. True?
Yes, but it almost never matters.
|> When you're familiar with the environment (as you are with Emacs), you
|> can get away without cleaning your environment first. However, the
|> safe approach is to only 'configure' in a clean environment.
It has been a long time since I last did a make clean.
|> CPU cycles are relatively cheap nowadays... ;-)
Why should I waste CPU cycles when I can do more important things with
them?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, (continued)
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/05
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/05
- Re: INSTALL-CVS,
Andreas Schwab <=