[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: recent emacs font problems?
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: recent emacs font problems? |
Date: |
08 Jul 2003 09:40:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> * In message <address@hidden>
> * On the subject of "Re: recent emacs font problems?"
> * Sent on 07 Jul 2003 23:16:54 +0100
> * Honorable Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
>
> David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
> > Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
> > >> * Honorable "Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:
> > >> so if anyone with access to MS Windows could try it, we can see if it
> > >> works there.
> The fix works on MS-Windows.
indeed.
> > > libc.lib(strftime.obj) : error LNK2005: _strftime already defined in
> > > temacs1.lib(strftime.obj)
> > > obj-spd/i386/temacs.bin : fatal error LNK1169: one or more multiply
> > > defined symbols found
>
> The above link errors were fixed soon after they were reported.
indeed.
unfortunately, right now both win32 and rh9-gnu-linux builds fail with
the same error:
w32:
"d:\gnu\emacs\src/obj-spd/i386/temacs.exe" -batch -l loadup dump
emacs: Invalid hash table rehash size: 0.0
linux:
...
emacs: Invalid hash table rehash size: 1.12341E-311
I do not have the linux error message in front of me, but the gist is
that the rehash size was not initialized.
linux sets the un-initialized double float with junk (that's where e-300
is coming from) while w32 sets it to 0.
but the bottom line is that the rehash size is un-initialized.
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html>
cogito cogito ergo cogito sum