Re: utf-8 cjk translation bug?

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>>  Yeah, that's definitely the case, and it's not just a problem with
>>  double-width characters -- the coverage of many iso10646 fonts seems
>>  completely crap.

> BTW, does this mean that the new unicode emacs will have problems
> rendering many charsets that are currently displayed properly by emacs?

No.  In emacs-unicode, we can assign multiple fonts for each
script, charset, or a range of character codes, and Emacs
selects one that has a requested glyph and has the highest
priority depending on the current langauge environment.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden