[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock
From: |
Alexander Pohoyda |
Subject: |
Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock |
Date: |
24 Oct 2003 21:12:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Hrvoje Niksic <address@hidden> writes:
> >> > what code tests this?
> >>
> >> I don't have the sources handy. It seems that the code recognizes
> >> the buffer as temporary by checking for names that begins with
> >> space. For instance, this works (returns t):
> >>
> >> (let ((newbuf (generate-new-buffer "*foo*")))
> >> (with-current-buffer newbuf
> >> (c-mode)
> >> (font-lock-mode 1)
> >> (prog1 font-lock-mode
> >> (kill-buffer (current-buffer)))))
> >>
> >> Change "*foo*" to " *foo*", and it no longer works, i.e. it
> >> returns nil.
> >
> > I have just tested it on recent Emacs and this code always works
> > (returns t).
>
> Then the bug may have been fixed already. Could you please also
> check whether the buffer is actually fontified? For example:
>
> (let ((newbuf (generate-new-buffer "*foo*")))
> (with-current-buffer newbuf
> (c-mode)
> (insert "\"a string\"")
> (font-lock-mode 1))
> (switch-to-buffer newbuf))
>
> If things work, using both "*foo*" and with " *foo" should result in
> a buffer with fontified "a string".
Yes, both cases work. If I comment out (font-lock-mode 1), things
still work.
--
Alexander Pohoyda <address@hidden>
PGP Key fingerprint: 7F C9 CC 5A 75 CD 89 72 15 54 5F 62 20 23 C6 44
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/23
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/23
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/24
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/24
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock,
Alexander Pohoyda <=
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/24
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/25
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/25
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/26
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Hrvoje Niksic, 2003/10/26
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/26
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/27
- Re: (font-lock-mode 1) does not always force font-lock, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/28