Re: Incomplete output from "cvs annotate"

[Simon Josefsson]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> IMHO, it shouldn't.  If the data need to be collapsed into the same
>>>> buffer, it should happen inside Emacs, not by cloning the fd.  So using
>>>> a BUFFER cons cell in VC for call-process isn't a solution, using just
>>>> one BUFFER should work.
>>>
>>> This is what VC is doing.
>>
>> So what's the problem?  If VC is using a cons cell,
>
> I think you misunderstood me, VC is using a single buffer for both
> stdout and stderr, which is why the bug occurs.

Ah, right.  I thought you were saying the opposite.  Sorry.